+1 for the 2.2.5 tarball: good signature, test suite passes on Linux/x86_64, looks sane from manual inspection.
joe
- [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.38 release candidate ... Jim Jagielski
- Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.38 release c... Jim Jagielski
- Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.38 release c... Guenter Knauf
- Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.38 release c... Gustavo Lopes
- Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.38 relea... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.38 release c... Joe Orton
- Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.38 release c... Steffen
- Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.38 release c... Steffen
- Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.38 release c... Ruediger Pluem
- Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.38 relea... Jim Jagielski
- Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.38 r... Ruediger Pluem
- Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.... Jim Jagielski
- Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.38 release c... Ruediger Pluem
- Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.38 release c... Nick Kew
- Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.38 relea... Jim Jagielski
