On Aug 17, 2007, at 1:46 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
On 8/17/07, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does this change really require a CHANGES entry??
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: covener
Date: Fri Aug 17 10:33:11 2007
New Revision: 567091
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=567091
Log:
AFAICT, LDAP_CACHE_LOCK was a no-op when virtualhosts were used
I can expand or remove it; there's crash/hang potential (observed) as
the cache code goes into shared memory.
How about creating a PR about it and then closing it out.
That way it's a documented bug that is closed; if it
affects people, the PR will provide insight into what
was wrong and what was fixed, and the CHANGES entry
can be adjusted to reflect the PR number.
