On 8/17/07, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does this change really require a CHANGES entry??
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Author: covener
> > Date: Fri Aug 17 10:33:11 2007
> > New Revision: 567091
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=567091
> > Log:
> > AFAICT, LDAP_CACHE_LOCK was a no-op when virtualhosts were used

I can expand or remove it; there's crash/hang potential (observed) as
the cache code goes into shared memory.

-- 
Eric Covener
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to