On Aug 24, 2007, at 7:47 PM, Sander Temme wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 08/24/2007 02:54 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
To be honest, I can't see holding off the 1.3 release any longer
while we're waiting on APR as well as stuff is being added
to the 2.x trees... It's kind of embarrassing.
+1.
As far as I understand this "downgrade" scenario is one of the
reasons
why we aim to release all stable branches at the same point of time.
It might help to keep the release quiet: put the code out there and
update the page, but keep it off the front page and out of the public
channels.
We can even do the same for 2.0.x once we have our regression
fixed, and
then make a splash for all three when 2.2.x is done.
This is all well and good, except, to be honest, how confident
are we that 2.x will be released any time soon? If they
were, I'd say wait and release/announce all 3 together.
We've pushed back the releases at least 3 times already;
1.3 is ready; 2.0 and 2.2 aren't, yet, and we have no
real idea when then will be. Like I said, I can't
see keeping 1.3.38 from our 1.3 users simply because
2.x isn't ready....
