[removed modperl cc]
+1 That's why the original patchset was prepared against trunk. The
backport in my previous mail is more for getting feedback from
early-adopters...
Issac
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Issac Goldstand wrote:
>> Nice. A cursory look appears to match what I have.
>>
>> I also dug up another nugget - a complete patch against httpd-2.2.6 for
>> the UDP support (excluding only the APR recvfrom issue) - I thought I
>> had it lying around somewhere. I included two; one with and one without
>> the APR backport. Rolf, try to use this (use the one with the
>> apr-backport) instead of downloading and patching trunk.
>
> Rather than busting on 2.2.{stale} I'd much rather focus on getting your
> proposed enhancements into trunk, and plow forward to ship 2.4 httpd for
> udp support. My 2c US (small and shrinking)
>
> Bill
