Hi, > I'm concerned with this commit; please revert. Consider that to > protect those developers/users who are in jurisdictions with > strict laws regarding cryptography, mod_ssl is *never* built by > default, but requires some explicit user action (--with-ssl on > configure/unix, creation of a srclib/openssl tree/link or other > intentional build schema change on win32, etc) which deliberately > causes cryptography to be added to httpd.
> USE_STDSOCKETS sounds to me like an otherwise very useful flag, and > doesn't give the user a hint that mod_ssl will be built. there's in fact no problem because finally you have to define a path to OpenSSL, otherwise mod_ssl will not be build; and that conforms to what you said above with 'creation of a srclib/openssl tree': # If WITH_MOD_SSL and OSSLSDK have been defined then build the mod_ssl module ifdef WITH_MOD_SSL ifneq "$(OSSLSDK)" "" SUBDIRS += ssl \ $(EOLIST) endif endif So in fact I introduced a manually switch where we did before unconditional build. Guen.