On Jan 28, 2008 9:22 PM, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> http://www.php.net/manual/en/ > >> faq.installation.php#faq.installation.apache2 > > > > "If you feel you have to use a threaded MPM, look at a FastCGI > > configuration where PHP is running in its own memory space." > > > > Is that what is meant by "Fastcgi is the "recommended way of using php > > and httpd 2, AFAIK. Isn't it???"? > > A single line seems a bit odd for the recommended approach. > > > > Consider that, for many people, the main advantage of Apache2 over > Apache1 is the worker MPM. Also consider that a threaded MPM and > mod_php aren't a happy couple. If using prefork, mod_php works > just dandy... but for other reasons you'd likely want to > consider FastCGI anyway...
I agree that FastCGI is the better technical solution, I'm just stating that neither the Apache documentation nor the PHP documentation seems to state that. Even worse, they hardly document the FastCGI way at all.
