On 21 Aug 2008, at 13:02, rahul wrote:
| >Any thoughts on dropping it in to trunk, with a view | >to including it as standard in 2.4 in due course? || "mod_sed is much more than a mere string-or-regexp search-and- replace"What happens to mod_substitute? especially since what substitute provides seems to be a strict subset of mod_sed ?
That's a decision that can wait for 2.4, by which time we should have more user feedback to base it on. -- Nick Kew
