Paul Querna wrote:
[1] - I did this because tackling the apreq issue is way more
complicated -- the work around I did for parsing POST bodies for example
is completely unacceptable in the long run, but it 'works' for now --
In the long run we should import at least parts of apreq.
I'm particularly interested in helping with this. Given todays events
in infra@ land today, I might have some time soon. It will definitely
not make it for 2.3.0a thought.
I agree so far that libapreq and mod_apreq2 need to be decoupled.
server/libapreq
modules/filters/mod_apreq
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philip M. Gollucci ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) c: 703.336.9354
Consultant - P6M7G8 Inc. http://p6m7g8.net
Senior System Admin - RideCharge, Inc. http://ridecharge.com
1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C
Work like you don't need the money,
love like you'll never get hurt,
and dance like nobody's watching.
