Nick Kew wrote:
On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:43:57 -0800
Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Trunk is CTR, but I do want to make sure no one is completely opposed
to pulling in mod_wombat.
In a dev branch, I've done the work to pull it all together:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/wombat-integration
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/wombat-integration/modules/wombat/
Including fully integrated in the build system, and removing the
dependency on apreq[1].
Any opposition to merging it to trunk?
How about some ballpark figures for the footprint - both disc and
memory - of this proposal? That is, mod_wombat taken together with
lua and any other dependencies like apreq if used.
First off, all of the mod_wombat stuff is a module. You can compile it
all out.
Lua[1] is very very small, and generally fast compared to Perl, PHP or
Python. I really don't want to go into proving that on the mailing list
-- if you don't want it, compile it out.
On Apreq, which this merge does _not_ include, I think we should include
parts of it, regardless of size -- things like the parsing POST bodies
which can get very complicated with multipart mime is not something
module should have to figure out itself. Apreq does it right in a
streaming parser, lets us it.
Thanks,
Paul
[1] - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lua_(programming_language)
