On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Bing Swen <bs...@pku.edu.cn> wrote: > > "Jim Jagielski" <j...@jagunet.com> wrote on 2008-12-14 23:24 > > >> On Dec 13, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> >>> >>> 2. A number of non binding positive votes and positive feedback. >>> 3. Binding votes: >>> >>> 0 -1 >>> 0 +0 >>> 8 +1 (Colm, Sander Temme, Brad, Jim, Bill, Lars, Jeff, Ruediger) >>> >>> So the vote has passed. >>> >>> I will copy the release files to the dist directory now and give the >>> mirrors >>> about 24 hours to catch up. I plan to announce the release officially by >>> tomorrow evening CET. >>> >>> >> Don't forget to update the various site files, announcements, >> etc... as of this morning, 'http://httpd.apache.org/' and >> 'http://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi' still refer to 2.2.10 >> with smatterings of 2.2.11 around >> >> > It may seem to be an out of fashion question, > but I hope anyone can give a clear answer: > > How long will we have a compilable Windows x64 httpd-x.y.z release? > Infinitely long? ;-) > > Bing >
For the early httpd-2.2.x series it has compiled on Win64. Then again it's very picky in which platform you use. Win XP x64 + VS2005/8 works best. Vista x64 is has some problems with platform SDK (not sure they are fix now). How long will they be compilable? I don't know. I think it has more to do with the makefile(s) than with the code it self. ~ Jorge
