----- Original Message ----
> From: Joe Schaefer <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 9:42:20 AM
> Subject: Re: Configuration change for c...@httpd?
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> > From: "William A. Rowe, Jr."
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 9:37:58 AM
> > Subject: Re: Configuration change for c...@httpd?
> >
> > Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > > ----- Original Message ----
> > >
> > >> From: "William A. Rowe, Jr."
> > >> To: [email protected]
> > >> Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 9:12:28 AM
> > >> Subject: Re: Configuration change for c...@httpd?
> > >>
> > >> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > >>> To: undisclosed-recipients:;
> > >>>
> > >>> to headeradd for c...@httpd, overriding the normal To:
> > >>> [email protected]. That should prevent Reply-All from picking up
> > >>> the commit list, since there won't be anything in the To: or CC:
> > >>> fields for it to use.
> > >> Last I checked, thunderbird reply-all does cc undisclosed-recipients.
> > >> Very irritating given how we configured the apmail reply-to-all's.
> > >
> > > Are you sure? AIUI the list is now configured to behave in the
> > > same way that ezmlm deals with moderation requests.
> >
> > Correction, the exact header used for the apr moderation queue is;
> >
> > To: Recipient list not shown: ;
> >
> > so not the same thing as "undisclosed-recipients:"
>
>
> Updated.
FWIW, RFC-2822 says the text shouldn't matter, as both headers constitute
empty groups (albeit with different names).
