Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> Nice. How do people actually handle moderation at the ASF then? >> You're *supposed* to be using Reply-All when you want to accept >> a post. Are none of these clients out there ezmlm-compatible? > > Gmail does the same thing in my last set of moderation emails (the > last list I moderated got deleted last month). Reply-all yields > -accept, not found, -allow. > > I don't *recall* that being the behavior before with Gmail, but it > seems that's what it does now... -- justin
I've simply lived with the bother of removing the offending address, or forgetting and just throwing away the automatic reply (from the mail transport for unknown-recipients or from httpd against cvs@). I'd prefer we don't throw away the to: header, it will make filtering and sorting emails more difficult for some folks who lack any-header rich regex filtering features.