----- Original Message ----
> From: Jim Jagielski <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 3:06:42 PM
> Subject: Re: Configuration change for c...@httpd?
>
>
> On Jan 2, 2009, at 1:54 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >
> >
> > [email protected] routes to the bit-bucket, so that would work for the To:
> > header. That's what I would recommend doing at this point, although I've
> > just implemented Justin's recommended config and will stop there until
> > the list comes to a decision.
> >
>
> If we have [email protected], would that make it
> easier for people's filters?
It seems to me that the way the list is currently configured will
upset the fewest number of people. The only people who get burned
right now are people who reply to one of Justin's commit followups
and are not subscribed to c...@httpd (they get a bounce). They can
rectify that by either subscribing or trimming c...@httpd from their
reply headers.
