On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Brian McCallister <bri...@skife.org> wrote:
> Bertrand,
>
> I just send in a patch on the message with subject "patch for handling
> headers_in and headers_out as tables in mod_lua" which takes knowledge
> of setting headers_in, headers_out off the request which, with that
> patch, can just push the apr_table_t as a boxed pointer allowing
> lua-style [] access and modification.
>
> Does that work?
Yes, it will work, thank you :)
The advantage of having a function instead of a table for setting
headers_in/headers_out is that you can use luaL_checkstring() to make
sure the given parameters are of the correct type. I don't know what
the patch will return if someone tries to set a table like in
headers_out['Foo'] = {Bar = 'baz'}
Maybe it is possible to set a metatable for headers_in/headers_out
that would check on __index and __newindex if the value validates with
luaL_checkstring (just thinking out loud).
