On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Chris Darroch <chr...@pearsoncmg.com> wrote: > One thought I had overnight is that you might, if you like, want > to tackle the init SQL patch first, which seems unrelated to the > multiple pools idea and significantly simpler, easier to review, > and probably easier to backport as well.
Done. > Can you provide an example of how such initialization SQL queries > would be used? And, as a question, might it be necessary for such > queries to run before any other SQL queries are prepared? IIRC > in the patch they are run after the other queries are prepared, but > if they were truly required for connection initialization, they'd > need to be absolutely first, no? Prepared statements are not executed, just parsed (simplified), so no, it is not important for initialization statement to be before prepared statements. -- Marko Kevac
