Hi,
There are 2 weird things in the logic.
- In ap_proxy_add_worker_to_balancer() we make a copy of the worker, why
not just the address?
If you looks to child_init() in mod_proxy and mod_proxy_balancer we see
that mod_proxy initialise one copy and mod_proxy_balancer the other, it
is working but one of the copies is never used.
- We want the child_init of mod_proxy before mod_proxy_balancer, that
prevents reset() of the balancer_method to control the creation of the
worker.
Comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
