> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Jim Jagielski > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. Mai 2009 17:10 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Backports from trunk to 2.2 proxy-balancers > > > On May 6, 2009, at 11:04 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: > > > > > > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> Von: Jim Jagielski > >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. Mai 2009 16:59 > >> An: dev@httpd.apache.org > >> Betreff: Re: Backports from trunk to 2.2 proxy-balancers > >> > >> > >> On May 6, 2009, at 9:54 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> The problem is that this breaks existing configurations for 2.2.x > >>> as the balancers are now in separate modules. > >> > >> How so (the breakage, that is)?? You mean they requirement for > >> them to LoadModule them? > > > > Exactly. This is an unpleasant surprise for someone updating an > > existing installation from 2.2.a to 2.2.b. > > > > In that case, we could keep the trunk dir structure for any > "extra" balancers we may add in the 2.2 tree and move the old > balancer code back into mod_proxy_balancers.c (or, even better, > as sep files that aren't sub-modules :) ) Sounds fine to me. I am not opposed to the directory structure and separate files per se. Maybe we just link them into mod_proxy_balancer on 2.2.x whereas we keep them as separate modules on trunk.
Regards Rüdiger
