On 16.11.2009 13:14, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Danny Sadinoff <da...@sadinoff.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Danny Sadinoff <da...@sadinoff.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:53 AM, Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Danny Sadinoff >>>> <danny.sadin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> 2) Virtual hosts >>>>> The above item holds true even across virtual hosts. So while >>>>> it's possible to adjust the FcgidInitialEnv items on a per-vhost >>>>> basis, this is a recipe for disaster if two vhosts point at the same >>>>> fcgi executable, because the resulting processes with potentially >>>>> different Environments will be inserted into the same pool. Once that >>>>> occurs, we may expect that a server spawned with config defined in >>>>> vhost A will be parcelled out to vhost B. >>>> >>>> Where does this occur? Entries in the process table are distinguished >>>> by virtual host. (I think the implementation of this check is broken, >>>> in that it requires that ServerName is set in the virtual hosts. Are >>>> you using a simple test config that doesn't have ServerName set?) >>> >>> My case is not yet simple. I'll get back to you. >> >> It turns out that the problem was that I was using mod_fcgid-2.2 Upgrading >> to mod_fcigd-2.3.4 fixed the problem. I apologize for the noise. > > great/np > >> Should this item (vhost independence) be added to the upgrade notes section? > > Unfortunately, I'm still in the dark about vhost independence and how > exactly the share_grp_id construct in the source code can change the > process association without more code written to tie it to the > configuration. ISTR that Rainer made the same observation -- > share_grp_id isn't completely implemented. (Maybe it once worked and > some code was lost?)
Yes, the original mail was: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@httpd.apache.org/msg45336.html Regards, Rainer
