On 2/26/2010 5:38 AM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:17:14PM +0100, Rainer Jung wrote: >> >> I guess backporting is pretty straightforward. Wouldn't it be nice >> to already support this with 2.2.15?
That was always implicit in the proposal to tag 2.2.15 - catch up with the API. As Joe hinted in his reply, 0.9.8m will act like 0.9.8l, plus support of the new reneg protocol, unless told to also allow legacy renegotiation. >> Joe, do you already have a candidate, or should I suggest a backport >> patch myself? > > I'm working on this today. To answer Ruediger's question: yes, the > stuff in trunk should work with 0.9.8m since the API is the same, but I > haven't tested it yet. Joe; thanks to you, and all the others for efforts at closing this protocol issue, both at the openssl project and here at httpd. Pretty amazing how many httpd'ers here have helped in some phase, be it in the assessment, draft/discussion of the protocol revision, or implementation. It's fun collaborating with such brilliance - happy 15th Birthday httpd! http://www.computerworlduk.com/community/blogs/index.cfm?blogid=14&entryid=2810&RSS
