On Jun 2, 2010, at 9:30 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Jun 2, 2010, at 12:23 PM, Joe Orton wrote: > >> Thanks very much for all the responses. There is strong consensus for >> retaining support for some varieties of 0.9.8 and possibly some 0.9.7. >> >> A new RFC, then, for trunk/2.3 and beyond: >> >> - support and build warning-free with OpenSSL >= 0.9.8 >> - support and build with OpenSSL >= 0.9.7a, albeit with (harmless) >> compiler warnings about argument const-ness all over the shop >> - drop support for OpenSSL < 0.9.7a >> - drop support for non-OpenSSL/derivatives of OpenSSL >> >> (I have tried this out and it seems perfectly feasible.) >> > > How about --with-ssl only looks for OpenSSL >= 1.0.0 and > we have a new option, --with-old-ssl (or whatever) which > allows for 0.9.[87] varieties...
Would it reduce the complexity of the autofoo behind it enough to justify the increase in complexity for the user^Wbuilder? S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
