On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 5:26 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 6/2/2010 4:21 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 5:16 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On 6/2/2010 3:39 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > Thanks for the list! Do you know the best way to extract similar data for distros? > >>> Mod_proxy and mod_ssl (if ssl toolkit was > >>> detected) make good candidates for moving from "no" to at least > "default". > >> > >> mod_ssl was 'no' simply because of concerns about cryptographic law and > >> users in all these crazy jurisdictions. But I'm willing to consider > 'yes' > >> on the basis that if openssl is not found, the default becomes 'no'. > > > > Did you really mean no->yes or no->most for mod_ssl? > > > > Or are you also thinking some of the innocuous "most" move to yes > > (rewrite, expires, headers). > Can we move these from "most" to "yes"? expires and headers are probably tiny and will not do any harm and rewrite is so widely used that it's probably a good idea to have it in the "yes" even if it's not so tiny. > > Finally, remember that on unix if you don't do your ./configure > > homework you end up with all this stuff static. > > Sure, that's the beauty of --enable-mods-shared=most. Yes, I meant 'most' > :) > The size comment above mostly matters for static. Also, is there any way to have mod_deflate module to auto-detect zlib similar to your mod_ssl recommendations? Sergey
