On 10/5/2010 3:54 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:30 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wr...@rowe-clan.net> > wrote: >> On 9/24/2010 12:59 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >>> I'd like to spend the next two weeks or so looking for the low hanging >>> fruit, and tag 2.0.64 as something close to a final tarball in very >>> early October so it's truly out of sight, out of mind by ApacheCon. >>> Of course I'd love help - does 2 weeks sound reasonable to everyone? >>> >>> I'd also like to tag 2.2.17 on about the same timetable, probably not >>> nearly as final as 2.0 would be, but there is good stuff there. >> >> APR-util 1.3 is already tagged, and Jeff is planning to tag 0.9 Thursday. > > s/tagged/released/
... and tagged 0.9. Note 0.9 -util tag already failed on Darwin and we are holding 2.0 tag for a bundled expat for -util fix. There are four backport bullets in 2.0 STATUS with two signoffs already, if anyone has eyeballs to invest between now and when -util has been retagged. I'd hope this is the final 2.0 tag, so if any attract your attention as 'really should fix', this would be the day. I presume the bundled expat flaw did not apply to 2.2. Jeff was going to look at the last 2.2 patch per Joe's comments. Not sure if his travels interfere with this, so if he's unable I'm game to apply this with the additional footnotes before tagging. Before the tag, both trees will get freshened manual 'build all's for good measure.
