On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > I was reading bug reports this morning, and wondered if someone could take a > look at the patch offered here: > > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26052#c19 > > It adds a SetVirtualDocumentRoot configuration directive to mod_vhost_alias, > making numerous third-party applications behave sanely when run under > mod_vhost_alias. > > I've read the various justifications why we don't do this, and quite frankly > I don't understand them. Is there a legitimate reason that setting > DOCUMENT_ROOT on a per-dynamic-vhost basis is any different/worse than > setting it on a per-regular-vhost basis? I don't understand the distinction, > other than "we've never done it that way."
conceptually makes sense to me, at least in 2.3.x -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com
