On Dec 21, 2010, at 12:34 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 12/21/2010 10:38 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> On Dec 21, 2010, at 10:16 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> >>> On 12/16/2010 6:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>>> The Apache httpd 2.3.10-alpha test tarballs are available at: >>>> >>>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ >>>> >>>> Please vote on whether to release as 2.3.10-alpha. >>> >>> +1 to httpd-2.3.10-alpha.tar.gz/bz2 >>> (to the contents of httpd-2.3.10.tar.gz - but -1 to the current package >>> name) >> >> I've no idea how to grok this... do you want a rename of >> the archive names *as well as the resulting untarred dir* >> to be renamed or just the tar.* files? > > EDONTCARE, it's the package name I'm concerned about. So, let's refer to > 2.3.4 and 2.3.5 which were named correctly... looking at > archive.a.o/dist/httpd > > drwxr-xr-x 0 chip chip 0 Nov 25 2009 httpd-2.3.4-alpha/ > -rw-r--r-- 0 chip chip 0 Nov 25 2009 httpd-2.3.4-alpha/.deps > -rw-r--r-- 0 chip chip 8781 May 8 2009 httpd-2.3.4-alpha/.gdbinit > -rw-r--r-- 0 chip chip 14882 Feb 14 2008 httpd-2.3.4-alpha/ABOUT_APACHE > ...
See that's the rub: to get the untarred dirs to have that name, I need to reroll the whole thing. I'd prefer not having to do so at this point. As such, I'm guessing I can close the vote with at least 3 (binding) +1 votes.
