On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>
> On May 13, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 11 May 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>> The candidate tarballs for 2.3.12 are now available at:
>>>
>>>      http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>>>
>>> I'm opening up a vote to release these as 2.3.12-beta, with
>>> a hope to push on for a quick GA after maybe another beta
>>> release in the near future.
>>
>> +1 for httpd 2.3.12-beta (with external apr/apu)
>>
>> As noted by Rainer, the apu in httpd-2.3.12-beta-deps is broken, though. Is 
>> this ok or should the deps tarball be rerolled?
>>
>
> Reroll with what is the question? An older apu? We can't roll with
> HEAD.
>
> Maybe we could, with our APR hats on, push out a quick APU 1.3.12...

We should definitely have a new apr (Windows issue) and apu (LDAP
issue) before long, but what about just providing patches for this
beta?  I doubt that anyone consuming the beta would have a problem
with that.

BTW, I'm a bit behind and probably can't test until tomorrow.

Reply via email to