On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > On May 13, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > >> On Wed, 11 May 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >>> The candidate tarballs for 2.3.12 are now available at: >>> >>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ >>> >>> I'm opening up a vote to release these as 2.3.12-beta, with >>> a hope to push on for a quick GA after maybe another beta >>> release in the near future. >> >> +1 for httpd 2.3.12-beta (with external apr/apu) >> >> As noted by Rainer, the apu in httpd-2.3.12-beta-deps is broken, though. Is >> this ok or should the deps tarball be rerolled? >> > > Reroll with what is the question? An older apu? We can't roll with > HEAD. > > Maybe we could, with our APR hats on, push out a quick APU 1.3.12...
We should definitely have a new apr (Windows issue) and apu (LDAP issue) before long, but what about just providing patches for this beta? I doubt that anyone consuming the beta would have a problem with that. BTW, I'm a bit behind and probably can't test until tomorrow.