On 5/20/2011 4:48 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > ONLY the -deps tarballs have been changed/updated to include > apr-1.4.5/apu-1.3.12; Since these are provided as a service, > I see no reason to require a whole new vote, nor to invalidate > any votes on 2.3.12-beta proper.
On the subject of your post, totally agree, we can wait a bit longer for httpd-2.3.13(Win64) signatures :) Not many changes here since beta tag. But here's the meta issue; how will httpd, moving forward, deal with revisioning -deps when there is no sensible reason to have a new httpd release?
