On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Akins, Brian <brian.ak...@turner.com> wrote:
> On 6/15/11 6:01 PM, "Paul Querna" <p...@querna.org> wrote:
>
>> pocore: For base OS portability and memory pooling system.
>>   <http://code.google.com/p/pocore/>
>
> How does this compare to APR?

It's like an APR version 3.0.

It has a faster pools system, with the ability to free() items, and it
drops all of the apr-utilism things like databases, ldap, etc.

Reply via email to