On 6/20/2011 9:07 AM, Greg Ames wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Stefan Fritsch <s...@sfritsch.de > <mailto:s...@sfritsch.de>> > wrote: > > Speaking about config options, I think that MaxClients should be > renamed to MaxWorkers, because it limits the number of worker threads, > not the number of clients. As with the MaxRequestsPerChild -> > MaxConnectionsPerChild rename, we would still accept the old name with > a warning. Thoughts? > > +1. That's more accurate for sure, and more important when you loose the 1:1 > thread:connection ratio.
Can we call this MaxRequestWorkers, now that we have different sorts of workers living in the same process?
