On Jun 20, 2011, at 12:01 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > On Monday 20 June 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> On 6/20/2011 9:07 AM, Greg Ames wrote: >>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Stefan Fritsch <s...@sfritsch.de >>> <mailto:s...@sfritsch.de>> >>> >>> wrote: >>> Speaking about config options, I think that MaxClients should >>> be renamed to MaxWorkers, because it limits the number of >>> worker threads, not the number of clients. As with the >>> MaxRequestsPerChild -> MaxConnectionsPerChild rename, we >>> would still accept the old name with a warning. Thoughts? >>> >>> +1. That's more accurate for sure, and more important when you >>> loose the 1:1 thread:connection ratio. >> >> Can we call this MaxRequestWorkers, now that we have different >> sorts of workers living in the same process? > > Good point. Committed as r1137744
That kind of last-minute change is going to kill people trying to upgrade from 2.2 to 2.4 with a shared config. We should make MaxRequestWorkers an alias for MaxClients in a released 2.2.x ....Roy
