On 05.07.2011 23:21, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 July 2011, Igor Galić wrote:
>> even though it means that "reallyall" will yield different
>> results on different systems
>
> That was the point of "reallyall". Build everything that is possible
> with the installed dependencies. It wouldn't be very useful if you
> would need all kinds of weird third party libs to use it.
Agreed.
> BTW, I think it would be more useful if "all" enabled more modules.
> Basically what reallyall does except for examples, hard core
> debugging, very experimental, and very obsolete stuff.
>
> Here is what gets built for most (M) and all (A) and what I would like
> to change. The choices are certainly subjective, but I think there
> should be many changes where we all agree. So please comment.
Agree with all of it except for below comments.
> MA mod_file_cache # remove from 'most'
No strong opinion about that.
> MA mod_lua
Also suggest "A" as others did.
> MA mod_proxy_express # remove from 'most' (?)
If Jim thinks it is ready for prime time, it would be useful in M.
> A mod_sed # add to 'most' ?
Yes.
> mod_isapi # remove from 'reallyall' on unix
Surprised by the comment of Bill, since the docs page only talks about
Windows. Could be outdated.
> mod_log_debug # add to 'all'
Suggest M.
There's also mod_privileges, I think it is not in the list. I suggest:
mod_privileges
so reallyall for it?
Regards,
Rainer
