On 25 Aug 2011, at 15:48, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: > +1 for 2.3, -0 for 2.2. I guess for 2.2 we should only detect "misuse" (the > definition of misuse > needs to configurable) and reply with a 200 if misuse is detected.
Ok - given the patch a good test - and actually - am not sure we need even that (much) abuse detection. I find it darn hard to kill the server now; and would almost say that we can leave it as is. And PERHAPS have an optional cap on the number of ranges (Set at unlimited by default -leaving it to LimitRequestFieldSize to cap it off at effectively some 1200-1500). Thanks Dw
