On Aug 26, 2011, at 8:46 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:

> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] 
>> Sent: Freitag, 26. August 2011 14:38
>> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1161661 - 
>> /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http/byterange_filter.c
>> 
>> 
>> On Aug 26, 2011, at 8:31 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> 
>>> Agreed... The issue is that to merge, you need to parse... We could have
>>> ap_set_byterange() also return a set of start/stop points (in an
>>> array), so that the filter can work with that and not 
>> bother with rereading
>>> r->range. In fact, I think that makes the most sense... That 
>> is, adjust
>>> ap_set_byterange() to create the modified, parsed r->range, 
>> a return status
>>> and the start/stop array. The filter then goes thru that array.
>> 
>> So ap_set_byterange(request_rec *r, apr_off_t clen, 
>> apr_array_header_t *indexes)
> 
> What is clen?
> 

The content length… we need to know for ranges like 100- and -99


Reply via email to