On Sep 1, 2011, at 8:59 AM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 02:47:19PM +0200, "Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group" wrote: >>>> If we rip it out, we should replace it with ap_assert()s. And maybe >>>> only do it in 2.3? >>> >>> It would seem odd to have ENOTIMPL as a "fatal" error but other >>> "real" errors non-fatal. *No* error should occur here with unless >>> somebody has cooked up a really whacky bucket type. >> >> So you would follow the rip-out-and-replace-with-asserts approach? > > No, just remove the special case for ENOTIMPL and don't change anything > else. >
+1...
