I agree that it shouldn't be a blocker… I agree it would Be Nice if it was bundled… Let me look at fcgid and see what the current status is.
On Sep 15, 2011, at 9:55 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >> I plan on push for a GA in Oct (of this year)… >> >> The only 2 showstoppers I see as "reasonable" are the >> documentation ones and the mod_fcgid one. I plan on adding >> doccos for the ones that are currently lacking, but the >> question is what to do about mod_fcgid… What's the best >> way to accomplish folding mod_fcgid into 2.4? Should we copy >> trunk of mod_fcgid and put it into trunk of 2.4? Use some svn >> mojo? etc…? > > The bundling of fcgid shouldn't be a blocker IMO. Much to my > disappointment I haven't had time to work on it lately, and I see that > no one else has either. There's little time remaining in 2.4 > development and no apparent tuits to make effective use of the > bundling by moving towards a more 2.4-centric/exploitive > implementation, and at the same time bundling means one more test > scenario for getting fixes out to users of fcgid with 2.2.x. > > For users, bundling saves one download and one tar/unzip. It builds > within the httpd tree currently if desired. >
