On Sep 17, 2011, at 10:02 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > On Sep 15, 2011, at 9:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> I plan on push for a GA in Oct (of this year)… >> >> The only 2 showstoppers I see as "reasonable" are the >> documentation ones and the mod_fcgid one. > > Could you enumerate what you feel is lacking in the documentation? I know of > several modules that are effectively undocumented, and a few more that have > minimal, but insufficient documentation. I'd like to hear your take on this. > As always, I'm willing to whatever I can on the editing, formatting, etc, > side of things, but the raw info needs to come from somewhere. Please let me > know where I can be of assistance. >
Just the possible fact that some modules may not have doccos… Not sure if that is even the case (yet), but if there are mod's w/o docs, then we can't in good conscience ship the mods.
