On 9/16/2011 12:51 AM, Issac Goldstand wrote: > IIRC, we talked about making 2.0 EOL when we make the next release, but > I don't think we ever formalized the decision. > > Does anyone have comments for or against announcing 2.0 End-Of-Life at a > set time (say 3 months) following the release of 2.4?
Yes, I'd prefer we set a 12 month sunset on 2.0 in conjunction with the 2.4 release, not 3 months later when nobody is paying attention.
