On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 07:00:07AM -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 11/11/2011 3:12 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > > > >I don't see why we would continue to support 2.0.x for longer than > >Redhat's already long support cycles. > > I don't see why we would tie this to RedHat's schedule or any other > vendor, including my own.
If you did, then perhaps Solaris 10 was another option - that's around for at least another 5 years with 2.0. :) vh Mads Toftum -- http://soulfood.dk
