On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 07:00 -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 11/11/2011 3:12 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > > > > I don't see why we would continue to support 2.0.x for longer than > > Redhat's already long support cycles. > > I don't see why we would tie this to RedHat's schedule or any other > vendor, including my own. >
+1 Apache (like most daemons), move forward, it's tuff luck if certain distros (which RedHat is not the only popular one), that insists on continuing to live in the dark ages. (and if they are using something that old Apache is likely the least of their problems)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
