Thanks for the understanding. Experience is that win issues hardly land in the status. Mostly the answer is make a bug report, and it is of the table and sitting as reported bug for a very long time. Take for example the serious bug from Mario about the balancer in 2.3. An other are the mod_fcgid bugs.
Also I cannot believe that eg the rewrite p issue was/is(?) only win. I propose that the ASF is also going to run windows on one of the heavier/complex sites !! Maybe a vote on that can started. Please consider. Steffen Op 16 jan. 2012 om 06:15 heeft Sander Temme <scte...@apache.org> het volgende geschreven: > > On Jan 12, 2012, at 2:24 AM, Steffen wrote: > >> We have at least 4 hard bugs in 2.3.16. Known for a long time, and no need >> to exposure more for these. > > Are they listed in STATUS under the Release Showstoppers section? That > currently only lists the need to remove undocumented modules as showstopper, > and I believe we have even booked some progress on that one. Going by > STATUS, things do indeed look stable, good and happy. > > This is not so much for folks like yourself who are intimately familiar with > these bugs, but more for the rest of us who don't use Windows and may never > encounter the problems. > >> Fine a GA, with a big note that it is not ready for Windows and advising to >> run 2.2.21 as proven stable. > > I would hate that: we have lots of users on Windows and I'd like to enable > them to use the latest, greatest. > > S. > >> >> So not happy with 2.4. >> >> >> Op 11 jan. 2012 om 16:37 heeft Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> het volgende >> geschreven: >> >>> Things look stable. >>> Things look good. >>> Things look happy. >>> >>> Sooooo are we ready to finally make this happen?? >>> I offer to RM. >> > > > -- > scte...@apache.org http://www.temme.net/sander/ > PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A > > View my availability: http://tungle.me/sctemme > >
