Stefan Fritsch wrote on Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 22:53:44 +0100:
> On Tuesday 21 February 2012, Michael Felt wrote:
> > FYI - I see no notable difference in the W messages with the IBM
> > vacpp (xlc) v7 compiler using no CFLAGS and CFLAGS='-O2
> > -qlanglvl=extc99'
>
> Hrm. Assigning function pointers to void * is not really portable. Not
> sure about the best way to fix this, yet, while keeping the code
> readable.
>
I think the issue is a constness mismatch?
> > "util_expr_eval.c", line 1601.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between types
> > "const void*" and "int(*)(struct {...}*,const void*,const char*,const
> > char*)" is not allowed.
There is a "pointer to constant" on the left and a "pointer to func with
such and such arguments and return value" on the right. Formally the
function object itself isn't marked as const...
> Cheers,
> Stefan
