OK, well, I'll work on getting the tools built. The RPM's are often ancient
and/or have strange dependencies I am trying to avoid.
tomorrow will do more.

On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Michael Felt <mamf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > patched manually, building...
>
> ouch...  maybe you have GNU patch installed as gpatch from the AIX Toolbox?
>
> anyway, in a subsequent e-mail I noticed other missing symbols...
> that's in the latest patch and, for the patch impaired, updated
> mpm_common.h, both attached
>
>
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Michael Felt <mamf...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> er, almost working:
> >> michael@x054:[/data/prj/httpd-2.4.1]patch -p0 -i *.patch
> >> Processing...  Looks like a unified context diff...
> >> The text leading up to this was:
> >> --------------------------
> >> |Index: include/mpm_common.h
> >> |===================================================================
> >> |--- include/mpm_common.h       (revision 1293841)
> >> |+++ include/mpm_common.h       (working copy)
> >> --------------------------
> >> Patching file include/mpm_common.h using Plan A...
> >> patch: 3016-037 Malformed patch at line 9: -void
> >> ap_reclaim_child_processes(int terminate,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Michael Felt <mamf...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> :) patch from AIX 6.1 works, starting build.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Michael Felt <mamf...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> re: not exported... They are not in the .o files either (or is that
> >>>> because they are not exported?)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Michael Felt <mamf...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I am not so smart I fear, and still no svm installed (working on
> >>>>> building gnudiff, but not done yet...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> root@x105:[/data/prj/httpd-2.4.1]patch -i *patch
> >>>>> Processing...  I cannot find a patch in there anywhere.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Michael Felt <mamf...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> > Unfortunately, although it builds fine, it does not start:
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > httpd: Syntax error on line 143 of /etc/httpd/httpd.conf: Cannot
> >>>>>> > load
> >>>>>> > /opt/httpd/libexec/mod_mpm_worker.so into server: rtld: 0712-001
> >>>>>> > Symbol
> >>>>>> > ap_fatal_signal_setup was referenced\n      from module
> >>>>>> > /opt/httpd/libexec/mod_mpm_worker.so(), but a runtime
> >>>>>> > definition\n      of
> >>>>>> > the symbol was not found.\nrtld: 0712-001 Symbol ap_pid_fname was
> >>>>>> > referenced\n      from module
> >>>>>> > /opt/httpd/libexec/mod_mpm_worker.so(), but a
> >>>>>> > runtime definition\n      of the symbol was not found.\nrtld:
> >>>>>> > 0712-001
> >>>>>> > Symbol ap_reclaim_child_processes was referenced\n      from
> module
> >>>>>> > /opt/httpd/libexec/mod_mpm_worker.so(), but a runtime
> >>>>>> > definition\n      of
> >>>>>> > the symbol was not found.\nrtld: 0712-001 Symbol
> >>>>>> > ap_relieve_child_processes
> >>>>>> > was referenced\n      from module
> >>>>>> > /opt/httpd/libexec/mod_mpm_worker.so(),
> >>>>>> > but a runtime definition\n      of the symbol was not
> found.\nrtld:
> >>>>>> > 0712-001
> >>>>>> > Symbol ap_graceful_shutdown_timeout was referenced\n      from
> >>>>>> > module
> >>>>>> > /opt/httpd/libexec/mod_mpm_worker.so(), but a runtime
> >>>>>> > definition\n      of
> >>>>>> > the symbol was not found.\nrtld: 0712-001 Symbol ap_mpm_safe_kill
> >>>>>> > was
> >>>>>> > referenced\n      from module
> >>>>>> > /opt/httpd/libexec/mod_mpm_worker.so(), but a
> >>>>>> > runtime definition\n      of the symbol was not found.\nrtld:
> >>>>>> > 0712-001
> >>>>>> > Symbol ap_wait_or_timeout was referenced\n      from module
> >>>>>> > /opt/httpd/libexec/mod_mpm_worker.so(), but a runtime
> >>>>>> > definition\n      of
> >>>>>> > the symbol was not found.\n\t0509-021 Additional errors occurred
> but
> >>>>>> > are not
> >>>>>> > reported.
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > I have been able to find a few of these routines in source code,
> >>>>>> > e,g,
> >>>>>> > server/mpm_unix.c, but the routines are not included in
> >>>>>> > server/mpm_worker.o,
> >>>>>> > hence ....
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > Suggestions welcome (other than filing a bug report).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I guess the problem is that those MPM APIs are not decorated with
> >>>>>> AP_DECLARE() so they don't get added to httpd.exp so they don't get
> >>>>>> exported from httpd on AIX.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Can you try the attached patch to mpm_common.h?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Born in Roswell... married an alien...
>

Reply via email to