On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:00 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > Because 1.3 code and docs are no longer maintained. Because 1.3 docs > shipped in the tarball, they got the whole deal when they downloaded it. > > By continuing to publish something out-of-date, we imply to users that > there is some support of that software that does not in fact exist IMHO. > Serving out-of-date docs is a disservice to our users. I agree that > anyone hitting a 1.3/ URL should be redirected to a pointer that they > need to re-obtain the tarball and use the embedded docs shipped with > httpd 1.3.42. >
We still use 1.3 in a few places (the shame! the shame!), and even I agree with this rational. Cheers Tom