On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 17:03 +0100, Joe Orton wrote: > On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 08:00:25AM +0200, Kaspar Brand wrote: > > My thinking was that people should explicitly tell configure that they > > want to link with the libs in a build directory (so that they don't > > "accidentally" use a directory which might only temporarily exist - > > that's also the primary reason for preferring the static over the shared > > libs from that dir). > > This all seems totally crazy to me. Why are we adding complexity to the > httpd build system so openssl devs can skip typing the " install" part > of running "make install" when testing against modified versions of > OpenSSL? Joe
+1
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part