I don't have any rewrite rules.  
<Location /dynamic>
        #ProxyPass ajp://localhost:8009/dynamic
        ProxyPass http://localhost:8080/dynamic
        ProxyPass ws://localhost:8080/dynamic

And
Alias "/static" "/opt/sitestatic"
<Directory "/opt/sitestatic">

Now, with the ProxyPassReverse present about 50% of the files transfered get 
that 404 -as- served by Tomcat (based on Apache-Coyote/1.1 header). Despite the 
URL being something like  /static/hello.jpg.

On 2013-03-17, at 6:33 AM, Jamie Johnson wrote:

> Also I have a different rewrite rule for http and ws...not sure that is 
> required though
> 
> On Mar 17, 2013 6:31 AM, "Jamie Johnson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Definitely interesting.  I had gotten this working but I was only serving 
> sine html through tomcat and I made the endpoints different while testing 
> even though they were coming from the same application in tomcat...mine are 
> birth being proxied as well no rewrite involved
> 
> On Mar 17, 2013 12:35 AM, "Nathan Quinlan" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I do not know why but for some reason ProxyPassReverse doesn't play nice with 
> Tomcat and I had to include an extra line for the ws: protocol.
> 
> Additionally with the ProxyPassReverse present I would see crazy response 404 
> headers when loading say 30 small images on screen like:
> Content-Length        1003
> Content-Type  text/html;charset=utf-8
> Date  Sun, 17 Mar 2013 04:09:28 GMT
> Server        Apache-Coyote/1.1
> 
> The interesting thing was that in this case the image being loaded had  a 
> totally different URL (/a proxy to Tomcat,  /b static content) and was 
> handled outside of Tomcat via a rewrite rule and a <Location>  but when the 
> ProxyPassReverse was removed images were fine.    
> Images that were not 404 show up in the access_log of httpd  but the 404 
> files with the crazy header do not.
> 
> 
> 
> On 2013-03-16, at 12:37 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> 
>> I just took a quick stab and it was pretty straight forward, I just added 
>> lines like this and it appeared to work properly
>> 
>> ProxyPass /ws http://hostname:port/ws/websocket
>> ProxyPassReverse /ws http://hostname:port/ws/websocket
>> 
>> again, this appeared to work properly I am next going to be giving SSL a try 
>> to see if things work properly with that.  If what I did above is not right 
>> any info would be appreciated.  Also should I expect the SSL support to work?
>> 
>> 
>> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Jamie Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I've just built the latest code on trunk to test proxy_wstunnel, but haven't 
>> seen any documentation on how to configure it.  Is this available anywhere?
>> 
> 

Reply via email to