On 23 September 2013 22:35, Jeff Trawick <[email protected]> wrote: > > In 2.4 the syslog logging wouldn't be implemented as a provider, the ErrorLog > directive parser would be different, new structure fields would be at the > end, but otherwise it shouldn't be hard :) >
It could be theoretical backward compatibility issue if someone uses log named the same as some provider. Why not add new directive LogProvider? -- Ivan Zhakov
