On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Ivan Zhakov <i...@visualsvn.com> wrote:
> On 23 September 2013 22:35, Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > In 2.4 the syslog logging wouldn't be implemented as a provider, the > ErrorLog directive parser would be different, new structure fields would be > at the end, but otherwise it shouldn't be hard :) > > > > It could be theoretical backward compatibility issue if someone uses > log named the same as some provider. Why not add new directive > LogProvider? > I've never seen a log file within the ServerRoot directory. The risk of such a configuration and it matching a provider actually loaded seems low enough (and with an easy enough workaround) to forgo having a different configuration directives between 2.4/next-major-release. But maybe ErrorLogProvider provider-name arg1-n would be nicer anyway (same in all applicable branches). > > -- > Ivan Zhakov > -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... http://emptyhammock.com/
