On 23.11.2013 14:15, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de > <mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de>> wrote: > > On 22.11.2013 23:03, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Anyone ever try OpenPA? > > > > https://trac.mcs.anl.gov/projects/openpa/ > > > > It's under MIT, fwiw. > > Haven't tried it but the README > > http://git.mcs.anl.gov/radix/openpa.git/blob_plain/HEAD:/README > > indicates only platform support based on gcc plus Windows (but they say > they haven't set up a build system for it) plus Solaris (but that seems > to be Solaris 10+ only, at least my oldest Solaris 8 doesn't seem to > have the needed implementation). > > Regards, > > Rainer > > > By the way, Rainer, in your l*m*n test combinations, which compiler(s) > did you use on Solaris while confirming that 2.4.7 Event works at least > a little?
I'm only building with gcc. On Solaris 8 with gcc 4.1.2, on Solaris 10 the latest and greatest (4.8.2). Will post the full 2.4.7 results a bit later (only for the sake of completeness), but the builds are also broken for event on Linux 32 Bits even when using gcc: [Thu Nov 21 11:34:53.149765 2013] [mpm_event:crit] [pid 18492:tid 3080439472] AH02405: atomics not working as expected Sorry for not having checked progress during the tests, but the last combinations just finished right now. Regards, Rainer
