I'm just curious why people never saw this on trunk... That code path is almost exactly a year old. No one has hit this in 12 months??
On Nov 23, 2013, at 12:45 PM, Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> wrote: > On 23.11.2013 14:15, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de >> <mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de>> wrote: >> >> On 22.11.2013 23:03, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> Anyone ever try OpenPA? >>> >>> https://trac.mcs.anl.gov/projects/openpa/ >>> >>> It's under MIT, fwiw. >> >> Haven't tried it but the README >> >> http://git.mcs.anl.gov/radix/openpa.git/blob_plain/HEAD:/README >> >> indicates only platform support based on gcc plus Windows (but they say >> they haven't set up a build system for it) plus Solaris (but that seems >> to be Solaris 10+ only, at least my oldest Solaris 8 doesn't seem to >> have the needed implementation). >> >> Regards, >> >> Rainer >> >> >> By the way, Rainer, in your l*m*n test combinations, which compiler(s) >> did you use on Solaris while confirming that 2.4.7 Event works at least >> a little? > > I'm only building with gcc. On Solaris 8 with gcc 4.1.2, on Solaris 10 > the latest and greatest (4.8.2). > > Will post the full 2.4.7 results a bit later (only for the sake of > completeness), but the builds are also broken for event on Linux 32 Bits > even when using gcc: > > [Thu Nov 21 11:34:53.149765 2013] [mpm_event:crit] [pid 18492:tid > 3080439472] AH02405: atomics not working as expected > > Sorry for not having checked progress during the tests, but the last > combinations just finished right now. > > Regards, > > Rainer >
