Am 07.03.2014 18:58, schrieb Mikhail T.: > On 07.03.2014 12:28, Yann Ylavic wrote: >> Sorry, this was posted from gmail... > Is it written anywhere in the bylaws of this mailing list > that use of HTML is something to apologize for?
nearly any mailing-list has it written clear, some even reject HTML and on some others you get warned by the owner (postfix as example) https://www.google.com/search?q=mailing+list+etiquette+plaintext+only https://www.google.at/search?q=mailing+list+etiquette+no+html _____________________ http://www.apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html Note: Spam filters don't like messages with empty Subjects; just use e.g. "subscribe" or "unsubscribe". Spam filters are also more likely to reject HTML-formatted messages; please use plain text > With all due sympathies to Reindl's medical condition, why must we -- > in the second decade of the 21st century -- deny ourselves the means > of expression afforded by HTML on this list? because the message had no single HTML formatting and was written in plain but as HTML may be a godd reason it hardly makes sense to write email in HTML, they just explode after some replies/quotes and forwardings with different clients while a conversation in plaintext survises thousands of replies without lose a sane quoting
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
